New APM report reveals how project managers can deliver in extreme environments
The war in Ukraine has highlighted an uncomfortable truth. Our world is becoming increasingly Volatile, Uncertain, Complex and Ambiguous (VUCA). Events that are described as ‘once in a lifetime’ or ‘once a generation’ are becoming regular occurrences. In the past three years alone, we have seen a global pandemic, an energy crisis, record-breaking temperatures and now an economic crisis. It’s rapidly becoming more important than ever that project and programme managers adopt an awareness of the skills needed to deliver projects in uncertain times.
By drawing on the insights of those who have operated in some of the most challenging environments on the planet, Association for Project Management (APM) has published a new report, Managing Projects in Post-Conflict and Disaster Zones, which shares the key learnings from their experiences of delivering projects.
Project management in extreme environments requires a specific skillset, but what does this look like? And what does it take to be effective in this arena? Managing Projects in Post-Conflict and Disaster Zones shares insights from professionals working in the military and humanitarian non-governmental organisations on bringing structure to chaotic situations through good project management.
While there is no doubt that good projects have always been adaptive and responsive, our changing and challenging world means this has become even more critical. This means many insights from the report can also be applied to ‘regular’ project management.
James Simons, APM’s Content Publishing Manager, said: “While the catalyst for this paper has been the war in Ukraine, the fact that we live in turbulent times means that project professionals must be adaptive and ready to pivot when called on to do so. Delivering projects in extreme circumstances is becoming increasingly commonplace, even in the UK. We therefore encourage all project professionals to take-away the learnings from this report; many of which can be applied to any type of project.”
Learnings from those who are used to dealing with extreme situations
When things get unclear, reaffirm your project’s purpose
The more uncertain the environment, the greater the focus should be on the overall impact rather than very specific results and outcomes.
Contributor, Lt Col Langley Sharp ran The Centre for Army Leadership and is author of Habit of Excellence: Why British Army Leadership Works. He explained: “You have to define the purpose of the mission and communicate it to everyone.
“If the purpose is clear, it galvanises everyone together… whenever things are seemingly so overwhelming, so complex, and so unachievable that fractures occur in your team, you must focus back on: what is your aim? What is the purpose of being here - the mission? That focus of mind allows you then to prioritise what work needs to be done and when it needs to be done.”
Use an agile approach if things are changing quickly
An agile approach is favoured for most emergency situations, especially in the initial response as it allows for any change as more information becomes available. The greater the element of emergency, then the argument grows for working in a more agile way.
It’s important to decide what the right method is for your project. For example, a sequential approach – with linear phases – may be appropriate for slow-burn development work in a relatively stable environment. But in emergency situations a more agile approach is required. Whatever the approach, the plan must be well communicated and understood.
Lt Col Langley Sharp strongly supports a flexible and adaptive approach to cope with today’s changing requirements, he commented: “With the complexity of the world today, linear plans are almost non-existent.”
Fully engage with stakeholders to support project success
Project managers must always engage with key stakeholders directly impacted by the project. This ensures everyone affected understands the goals and will be more likely to be on board.
Dan Connors, an ex-military intelligence officer who is Co-founder of Applied Influence Group, says that “influence mapping is a useful tool that can capture all the key stakeholders, their relationships, and what is driving them in terms of motivations. Nevertheless, the objective of stakeholder management is not just to understand what people want; it’s also to gain their trust and credibility so that you can achieve what you have set out as your objectives”.
Remember, all projects are delivered by people:
- All project managers should have compassion, whether it’s a humanitarian situation or a high-stress situation, leaders have a duty of care.
- It’s important to understand the individual strengths and vulnerabilities to maximise the ability of the team.
- Encouraging people to talk about issues and providing a safe space to decompress can be effective ways to support their well-being.
You can read the full report by downloading Managing Projects in Post-Conflict and Disaster Zones
3 comments
Log in to post a comment, or create an account if you don't have one already.
The blog highlights the massive disruptions and uncertainties that all projects face right now, but the lessons are appropriate to the way we did things when volatility was more localised, and will be appropriate when everything settles down again. As co-chair of APM's Benefits and Value SIG, I suggest that an excellent way to keep people on purpose and retain the confidence and support of stakeholders is through benefits management. But there's a difference between the "adaptable and flexible" approach to changing circumstances, and "Agile" which is time bound and objective bound. Let's not get them confused.
Thank you, and in particular the message on compassion and duty of care for our people. I hope senior managers can look above the profit line and find a pruposeful aim.
Page 5 of the ‘World Economic Forum Global Risk Report 2020’, Figure 4 (*link appended), vividly highlights the ‘Global Risk Interconnections’ driving increasingly VUCA delivery emerging in delivery across the broad spectrum of Political, Economic, Sociological, Technological and Environmental(PESTLE) domains of project delivery. In the UK, resource constraints and impacts to the ‘Iron Triangle’, reflecting inter-dependencies between Cost, Scope, Quality and Schedule, are ‘boxed-in’ by the ‘CUBE’ of Covid, Ukraine (graphically and powerfully illustrated above), Brexit and increasing Environmental unpredictability. Highlighting our need to “Remember, all projects are delivered by people”, resonates strongly with my own mission in promoting the ever more compelling need for ‘Evolving Project Leadership From command and control to engage and empower’(APM 2020). The scenarios depicted in the report were the more graphic for me as it awoke memories of my own visit to Patan Darbar Square in Kathmandu, but also prompted my recalling the research underpinning ‘Psychological First Aid’**and its ‘RAPID Model’, developed by Dr George Everly of John Hopkins University. It evidences and substantiates the remarkable effectiveness of an approach in which the practitioner engages in Reflective listening, Assessment of needs, Prioritization, Intervention, and Disposition. The power of this approach was evidenced and powerfully demonstrated as ‘victims’ of disasters such as Hurricane Katrina, and ‘9-11’, were taught to tap into their uniquely personal sources of inspiration. In fact this approach, limiting meetings to a maximum of 3 ‘interventions’ proved more effective than ongoing therapy, which fostered a dependence on the therapist! This all offers powerful avenues for further research and lessons for project leadership in securing stakeholder engagement in order to develop strongly collaborative delivery teams empowered to act with the agility, alacrity and resilience of ‘Complex Adaptive Systems’ (CASs). In addition, the findings of neuroscience*** now prompt fundamental revision if not defenestration of many demonstrably redundant and counter-productive traditional stereotypes of leadership, in both function, and form. Increasing uncertainties and increasing inter-dependencies so graphically illustrated here, present the project leader, howsoever committed to diligent conscientious planning, with a severe dichotomy. Setting a baseline and schedule with no regard for expected turbulence throwing up ‘known-unknowns’, and ‘unknown-unknowns’ is like one planning to sail to another continent, setting a course before setting sail and steadfastly holding to it despite the inevitability of changing wind, tide, currents, and weather… Navigating these uncertainties the effective project leader will embrace these findings in neuroscience adopting an informed unremitting sense-making approach in project delivery through empowering a resilient team, alert to emergent constraints and opportunities, and adept in navigating them. *https://www.apm.org.uk/news/new-apm-report-reveals-how-project-managers-can-deliver-in-extreme-environments/#comments ** Psychological First Aid | Coursera *** i.e. Dr Lisa Feldman Barrett, Dr Sabrina Cohen-Hatton, Dr Iain McGilchrist, Dr David Rock (SCARF Model) Dave Snowden (Cynefin Model).