What’s in a name? APM qualifications explained
APM recently announced its intentions to update the names of its qualification suite. From December our Introductory Certificate and APMP qualifications will be known as the APM Project Fundamentals Qualification (PFQ) and APM Project Management Qualification (PMQ) following the launch of our new APM Project Professional Qualification (PPQ) in April.
But why? Well, as the project management profession has evolved, so too have APM’s qualifications. They have developed organically over an extended period of time by different people for different purposes; as a result, their names, in particular, have adopted a number of variants and styles.
These include, for example, APM Professional which became APMP and then APMP – The Project Management Qualification. The APM Introductory Certificate in Project Management is known as the IC, ICPM, Introductory Certificate and so on.
But we know from feedback we’ve had from training providers, employers and candidates that it can be difficult to understand how APM’s qualifications link together as a coherent progressive career path; something the profession has been looking for over a long period of time.
Bringing consistency to the names, guiding candidates and employers from the ‘fundamentals’ through ‘management’ to ‘professional’ levels of understanding, will help demonstrate that APM qualifications can support a candidate throughout their career, allowing them to be taken individually or in sequence.
Practically any re-branding will take some time to fully bed in and no doubt we will still see and hear references to the old names for some time to come. But the clearer we can be in demonstrating a progressive pathway, the more effective we will be in showing that project management is a career path worth pursuing.
We do hope that the change of name will clarify a gap in understanding the progressive nature of the suite thereby promoting a long term investment in professional development that the profession needs.
Paul Naybour is the Business Development Director for Parallel Project Training. He is a well-known speaker in the APM Branch Network, a Project Management Trainer and Consultant. He is also one of the voices behind the popular series of APM PMQ podcasts.
4 comments
Log in to post a comment, or create an account if you don't have one already.
Excellent Scott.
As a suggestion could you consider to adapt the below;
a table to map the re-branded APM qualifications to the IPMA four levels as of the present;
http://www.ipma.world/certification/certify-individuals/
Then repeat the table to include nominal dates for subsequent qualifications to cover all the IPMA four levels. Such could be structured dates as: draft 1, draft 2 etc. for example at IPMA level A.
In addition there could prove to be other qualifications in synchronization which I thought could be listed as a URL link; for example
http://www.apmg-international.com/en/qualifications/certifications.aspx
It's just a suggestion, hope it appeals.
Richard
Sunny Qata
With the new qualifications above and the transition from the old I am no longer clear which qualifications are required to acheive full membership and to carry the designation MAPM. can you advise?
Hi Brian, there are no requirements for any qualification to become a full member and membership is granted on experience (min. 5 years). However, passing the PPQ and PQ demonstrate the required experience and grant you full membership. I hope that makes sense, feel free to email me on tim.combley@apm.org.uk with any questions.
I have sadly had some negative comments and impressions, from other, reinforced today. The requirement to pass the associations own training schemes to achieve full membership, at some personal cost. There seems to have been no considerations of experience or attempts by your review panel to establish credentials before bestowing student level membership on a 20 years seasoned professional working under the most stringent of all construction contracts. Might I suggest you update your membership definitions, as I am clearly not just starting out on my career. I have asked for review and validation of the decision but as stated some negative stereotypes have been sadly reinforced.